QUOTE (cdanteek @ May 8 2007, 02:27 PM)

Dave, with your experience burning CDR's, I was sure you and I agree on buffer underrun protection.
My experience buffer underrun protection is default on any burn software I have used. So how can one explain Kaz's quote above.
Same hardware, different burn software.
If there is more to this story? My inquiring mind would like to know.
cd
Well, the problem in question is for Video DVDs, not CDRs. For CD-Rs, I can't think of any good reason to turn off buffer underrun protection. All audio gear seems to handle the buffer underrun "gap", and there's no problem on Data discs. Video DVD players may be a different beasty.
As for different output from different software on the same hardware, there are a couple theories I could propose. One is that one software defaults to a slower speed than the other and so buffer underrun is never invoked. Another is that one software is more efficient (less overhead) than the other and allows burning at faster speeds without invoking buffer underrun protection than the other. We don't know enough to argue about what the original poster has seen, and why.
However, John's observations make a good argument, in my mind, for turning off BURN Proof when writing Video DVDs if you're running at the edge of throughput on your machine. Actually, it makes an even better argument (in my mind again) for burning slower, even if you leave BURN Proof on.