Roxio Community: Does popcorn 2 Support multiple processors? - Roxio Community

Jump to content

Roxio Community
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Does popcorn 2 Support multiple processors? Multiple processors?

#1 User is offline   mrrjm 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 25-November 06

Posted 25 November 2006 - 11:42 AM

I'm using popcorn 1. When extracting or compressing video it only uses (1) processor. Does Popcorn 2 take advantage of more then one processor? My machine is a PowerMac G5 Quad processor.


mrrjm
0

#2 User is offline   Fukuhela 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 16-December 06

Posted 16 December 2006 - 06:15 AM

View Postmrrjm, on Nov 25 2006, 11:42 AM, said:

I'm using popcorn 1. When extracting or compressing video it only uses (1) processor. Does Popcorn 2 take advantage of more then one processor? My machine is a PowerMac G5 Quad processor.
mrrjm


I entered this forum to get the exact same answer. But contrary to you I have Popcorn 2.01 and it doesn't use the second processor. Why is that - can I enable it? Is it that hard to write or is Roxio just planing to have it as a new feature in Popcorn 3...? All new macs on the market use at least two processors...
0

#3 User is offline   macmidiguy 

  • Novice
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 82
  • Joined: 12-April 06

Posted 16 December 2006 - 06:19 AM

View Postmrrjm, on Nov 25 2006, 12:42 PM, said:

... My machine is a PowerMac G5 Quad processor.
mrrjm


That's interesting to me because I am in the market for the G5 quad.

I thought I read somewhere that there is some setting in system preferences but which control panel I can't recall.
LC520 (my first iMac), 3 other PowerPC legacy Mac's, iMac G3, iMac 3.06GHz
maybe you like the world in gray I prefer c o l o r f u l l
0

#4 User is offline   freshburn 

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,813
  • Joined: 04-January 06

Posted 17 December 2006 - 01:36 AM

It uses all the processors and altivec engine, it just depends on what you are doing. Export to iPod for example will use much more than re-compression.
0

#5 User is offline   macmidiguy 

  • Novice
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 82
  • Joined: 12-April 06

Posted 17 December 2006 - 06:23 AM

View Postfreshburn, on Dec 17 2006, 02:36 AM, said:

It uses all the processors and altivec engine, it just depends on what you are doing. Export to iPod for example will use much more than re-compression.



Sorry for adding to this thread:What does speed have to do with it...

My G4 apparently is dual processor. How can itest that the daul processors are actually working: for example when I am printing and at the same time running a simple application such as text edit ( with no other application on in the background ) there is a definate slow down during my typing. So I have always scoffed at this claim of dual processing. Incidently the G4 is maximized for RAM so I can't improve that area.
LC520 (my first iMac), 3 other PowerPC legacy Mac's, iMac G3, iMac 3.06GHz
maybe you like the world in gray I prefer c o l o r f u l l
0

#6 User is online   tsantee 

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,709
  • Joined: 04-January 06

Posted 17 December 2006 - 07:49 AM

View Postmacmidiguy, on Dec 17 2006, 06:23 AM, said:

Sorry for adding to this thread:What does speed have to do with it...

My G4 apparently is dual processor. How can itest that the daul processors are actually working: for example when I am printing and at the same time running a simple application such as text edit ( with no other application on in the background ) there is a definate slow down during my typing. So I have always scoffed at this claim of dual processing. Incidently the G4 is maximized for RAM so I can't improve that area.

I'm not an expert on this but I think you can monitor the processor usage using the Console application in the Utilities folder. You might find more info at discussions.apple.com for your model of Mac.

Edit: Oops, I was wrong. It is the Activity Monitor as described in the following post.

This post has been edited by tsantee: 17 December 2006 - 08:32 AM

I'm just a fellow Toast-user so please don't blame Roxio for any misguidance I may provide. And do let me know if your issue gets solved. Cheers from Eugene, Oregon!
0

#7 User is offline   mrrjm 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 25-November 06

Posted 17 December 2006 - 08:01 AM

Since I started this post I have to respond. My machine is a G5 quad with 8gb of EEC ram running the latest version of OSX. Popcorn 1 only uses the processing speed of one processor. I know this because I open up the activity monitor and watch the CPU useage. If all 4 processors where being used then the %of CPU for Popcorn would be 400%. 400% is all 4 processors at 100%. Programs like iPhoto, iMovie, etc. will use 200% or the processing power of 2 processors. Final Cut Pro and Aperture will peak out at almost 400%. They are written to take advantage of all 4 processors.

So going back to my original question...Does Popcorn 2 support multiple processors? If someone has Popcorn 2 please open the activity monitor when video is being compressed and see what the CPU% is. Is it at or around 100% or is it closer to 200%? You will need to have a Dual or Quad processor machine for obvious reasons.

Ray
0

#8 User is offline   mateo 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 08-February 07

Posted 08 February 2007 - 08:09 AM

I'm using Popcorn 2 on a Mac Pro 2.66 ... looks like roughly 220% usage. Currently, I'm taking a Video_TS folder to a MP4.
0

#9 User is offline   macmidiguy 

  • Novice
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 82
  • Joined: 12-April 06

Posted 09 February 2007 - 04:12 AM

View Postmateo, on Feb 8 2007, 09:09 AM, said:

I'm using Popcorn 2 on a Mac Pro 2.66 ... looks like roughly 220% usage. Currently, I'm taking a Video_TS folder to a MP4.



Is that good that P2 is hogging 220% ?
0

#10 User is offline   John at Roxio 

  • Digital Master
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,890
  • Joined: 25-March 06

Posted 09 February 2007 - 09:59 AM

If you are running other apps it will start using less, so its actually not a bad thing unless you are tring to do something else processor intensive.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users