record levels too low
#1
Posted 20 February 2007 - 12:01 AM
And, yes, I have the sound card levels for "Line in" set to max as well (accessories>entertainment>vol control>options>properties>adjust vol for "Recording">check "Line in" box> set vol to max).
I have tried using the mic input, but there seems to be a low buzz or hum, although I can get the levels right if I fiddle. Should I use the deck headphone output fed into the computer line in? Then I assume I could get levels right. But would I lose quality? Why doesn't straight "Line in" allow me to get higher levels? This happens with commercial tapes, so their output shouldn't be an issue.
Also, if I "Normalize" after recording at low levels, do I end up with the same quality as I would have if I had recorded with proper levels in the first place?
Any help greatly appreciated. I'm pretty new to digital recording.
-JWD
#2
Posted 20 February 2007 - 06:40 AM
Headphone socket - should be fine (but experiment with levels first before committing to a burn) and again with normalisation - it's subjective - try it and play around to get the levels and quality you like
Edited by gi7omy, 20 February 2007 - 06:40 AM.
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#3
Posted 20 February 2007 - 02:21 PM
gi7omy, on Feb 20 2007, 06:40 AM, said:
Headphone socket - should be fine (but experiment with levels first before committing to a burn) and again with normalisation - it's subjective - try it and play around to get the levels and quality you like
[size=6]Thanks gi7omy!
#4
Posted 20 February 2007 - 02:27 PM
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#5
Posted 22 February 2007 - 01:52 PM
Works fine using headphone jack output. Sounds good. Can also easily fix balance.
I don't recommend clicking "normalize" after selecting an album's worth of music, however.
Took about 20 minutes, with 'puter completely frozen during the process. No cancel option.
Even control>alt>delete wouldn't stop it (that window froze).
Finally finished though.
(Win XP SP2 Pentium 2.53 GHz, 1 GB RAM)
Thanks again, JWD
#6
Posted 22 February 2007 - 02:46 PM
Glad it worked out in the end tho - now get all that old stuff digitised
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#7
Posted 07 May 2007 - 12:10 PM
Glad it worked out in the end tho - now get all that old stuff digitised
We had a low level sound issue with a mic.
We wanted to do some singing.
Well the music store sold us this handy little
adaptor it says super sound impedance matching transformer MT-50
now we get a great sound level.
It has a big to little adaptor which plugs into my mic
input on my pc.
Maybe there is some kind of xlr cable and adaptor
for output and inputs of tape players.
#8
Posted 16 May 2007 - 03:05 AM
Headphone socket - should be fine (but experiment with levels first before committing to a burn) and again with normalisation - it's subjective - try it and play around to get the levels and quality you like
Actually, I'll disagree (late as this answer may be). The output of a tape deck is considered a "line level" and is the proper, high impedence level for going into a line-in jack on a sound card. At least it's worked for me for these many years.
In this case, it sounds like the higher level headphone output worked, which is great, but I suspect maybe the original problem was a case of not using the correct volume controls on the sound cards mixer.
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick it once and you'll suck forever. - Brian Wilson
[GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H MB | Athlon II X3 440 (3.0 GHz) | 2GB DDR2 RAM | 1-500GB HD (C: XP, G: Win7, D: - Apps, E: data & apps), 1-500 GB HD Data) | 2 - LiteOn DH20A4P DVD burners | External Dell QFlix DX-20A6Q DVD +/- writer | Windows 7 | Creator 2010 | Tektronix Phaser 850 solid ink printers | Epson R220 Photo/Disc printer | Ricoh GX 5050n dye sublimation ink | Epson Workforce 1100 printer
#9
Posted 16 May 2007 - 04:03 AM
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#10
Posted 25 May 2007 - 09:39 PM
Edit: I found a site to upload the clip. Here's the link. http://boomp3.com/m/fa19261a9c0d
Wy


Edited by wgrant, 25 May 2007 - 09:48 PM.
#11
Posted 26 May 2007 - 04:48 AM
Edit: I found a site to upload the clip. Here's the link. http://boomp3.com/m/fa19261a9c0d
Wy
I'm not sure which "version" of the song you uploaded, but I don't hear any horrible clipping. The first image simply shows that the input to your sound card is "hot" (a fairly high level) so you have to set the recording volume down to keep the digitized level reasonable. You could also try turning down the "Line Volume" control, or the "Rear Blue In" level. It's very possible that both are controlling your incoming recording level.
But, just because you need to set the controls down low doesn't indicate a problem. You definitely don't want the "clip" indicator to come on. (There's a caveat... if I'm digitizing an LP, then I'll let it clip if there are some noisy "pops" and "clicks".)
Hope that helps!
Edited by d_deweywright, 26 May 2007 - 04:51 AM.
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick it once and you'll suck forever. - Brian Wilson
[GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H MB | Athlon II X3 440 (3.0 GHz) | 2GB DDR2 RAM | 1-500GB HD (C: XP, G: Win7, D: - Apps, E: data & apps), 1-500 GB HD Data) | 2 - LiteOn DH20A4P DVD burners | External Dell QFlix DX-20A6Q DVD +/- writer | Windows 7 | Creator 2010 | Tektronix Phaser 850 solid ink printers | Epson R220 Photo/Disc printer | Ricoh GX 5050n dye sublimation ink | Epson Workforce 1100 printer
#12
Posted 27 May 2007 - 10:12 AM
But, just because you need to set the controls down low doesn't indicate a problem. You definitely don't want the "clip" indicator to come on. (There's a caveat... if I'm digitizing an LP, then I'll let it clip if there are some noisy "pops" and "clicks".)
Hope that helps!
Hi Dewey - thanks for your reply. In the first pic, the recording level indicator is really low. However in the 2nd pic, it was increased a tad which caused the clipping. For some reason, I can't adjust the volume of the Line In control. I can adjust the recording and Rear Blue In levels. How can adjust the Line In if it's not letting me? I don't have a separate sound card. I'm using the inputs from the motherboard.
Wy
#13
Posted 27 May 2007 - 11:50 AM
Wy
Well, you can only adjust the controls that the mixer lets you adjust. One other thing you may find is that mouse control of the sliders is much coarser than cursor movement control. That is, once you've selected a control, if you move it one visible "click" with the mouse, you can actually move it up and down using the up and down cursor keys where four cursor key clicks equals one visible mouse movement position. So you can get much finer control that way.
Hope that helps!
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick it once and you'll suck forever. - Brian Wilson
[GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H MB | Athlon II X3 440 (3.0 GHz) | 2GB DDR2 RAM | 1-500GB HD (C: XP, G: Win7, D: - Apps, E: data & apps), 1-500 GB HD Data) | 2 - LiteOn DH20A4P DVD burners | External Dell QFlix DX-20A6Q DVD +/- writer | Windows 7 | Creator 2010 | Tektronix Phaser 850 solid ink printers | Epson R220 Photo/Disc printer | Ricoh GX 5050n dye sublimation ink | Epson Workforce 1100 printer
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





