Hello,
I am working in an environment where two different networks coexist without any network connection; to exchange data, we used .zip floppies until last week when we got new hardware.
Now we use Sonic DLA so that our operators can easily exchange data between both environments : in fact, you write the files from one network on a CD-RW, which has been formatted as UDF, you eject the CD, load it in the second PC and then import the data. Then you do the opposite when needed (data sent to the DLA drive on computer B, CD-RW is ejected and loaded on computer A, and then data are read/copied).
OS is Windows XP SP2, HP workstations, DVD reader/CD-Burner.
From time to time we have issues : the CD is not read by one of the computers, you do not see the DLA drive in the Sent To menu, you cannot eject the CD, the computer is blocked... I tried to format one CD on one computer (and burn data to the CD only from the computer where it has been formatted), seems better but always the same issues...
Question is : is DLA reliable enough to do such a data transfer ? My feeling would be to use the DLA CD or DVD as another "hard disk", that is mounted and not often dismounted... Or should we use the Windows XP drag and drop feature ?
Thanks for your comments.
Regards,
Luuke
Page 1 of 1
DLA correct usage ?
#2
Posted 19 March 2007 - 01:33 PM
They do 2 different things.DLA is a Packet writing application.XP's is a session based writing.With DLA you have to format the discs.With XP you don't.Packet writing is notoriously unstable.You should really only use it for temporary transferring files.Never store anything on it that you need to keep.Session writing is a lot more stable.I think what you're seeing is the inherant problems with Packet writing.
"Do you wanna see me crawl across the floor to you?
Do you wanna hear me beg you to take me back?
I'd gladly do it because....."
Terry
AMD Athlon II X4 640 3.0Ghz processor
ASUS M4A88T-M/USB3 Motherboard w/VIA 8 channel sound
Power Color ATI HD5550 512mb DDR3 video card
4Gb DDR3 10666 memory
1Tb Hitachi SATA hard drive
(2) Lite-On iHAS224-06 SATA DVD drives
Rosewill Destroyer case
Dell DX-20A6Q QFlix DVD burner
Cambridge Soundworks THX 5.1 speaker system
I-inc iH-252HPB 25" widescreen monitor connected via HDMI
Dell 1100 Laser printer
Roxio USB Capture Device
Windows 7 OS
Do you wanna hear me beg you to take me back?
I'd gladly do it because....."
Terry
AMD Athlon II X4 640 3.0Ghz processor
ASUS M4A88T-M/USB3 Motherboard w/VIA 8 channel sound
Power Color ATI HD5550 512mb DDR3 video card
4Gb DDR3 10666 memory
1Tb Hitachi SATA hard drive
(2) Lite-On iHAS224-06 SATA DVD drives
Rosewill Destroyer case
Dell DX-20A6Q QFlix DVD burner
Cambridge Soundworks THX 5.1 speaker system
I-inc iH-252HPB 25" widescreen monitor connected via HDMI
Dell 1100 Laser printer
Roxio USB Capture Device
Windows 7 OS
#3
Posted 19 March 2007 - 02:24 PM
QUOTE (Luuke @ Mar 19 2007, 02:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hello,
I am working in an environment where two different networks coexist without any network connection; to exchange data, we used .zip floppies until last week when we got new hardware.
Now we use Sonic DLA so that our operators can easily exchange data between both environments : in fact, you write the files from one network on a CD-RW, which has been formatted as UDF, you eject the CD, load it in the second PC and then import the data. Then you do the opposite when needed (data sent to the DLA drive on computer B, CD-RW is ejected and loaded on computer A, and then data are read/copied).
OS is Windows XP SP2, HP workstations, DVD reader/CD-Burner.
From time to time we have issues : the CD is not read by one of the computers, you do not see the DLA drive in the Sent To menu, you cannot eject the CD, the computer is blocked... I tried to format one CD on one computer (and burn data to the CD only from the computer where it has been formatted), seems better but always the same issues...
Question is : is DLA reliable enough to do such a data transfer ? My feeling would be to use the DLA CD or DVD as another "hard disk", that is mounted and not often dismounted... Or should we use the Windows XP drag and drop feature ?
Thanks for your comments.
Regards,
Luuke
As has been suggested, if you are only doing temporary file transfers, it's ok. But as you are experiencing, packet writing software (which DLA is just one brand of) is not the most reliable beast out there, and they are not interchangeable between brands.I am working in an environment where two different networks coexist without any network connection; to exchange data, we used .zip floppies until last week when we got new hardware.
Now we use Sonic DLA so that our operators can easily exchange data between both environments : in fact, you write the files from one network on a CD-RW, which has been formatted as UDF, you eject the CD, load it in the second PC and then import the data. Then you do the opposite when needed (data sent to the DLA drive on computer B, CD-RW is ejected and loaded on computer A, and then data are read/copied).
OS is Windows XP SP2, HP workstations, DVD reader/CD-Burner.
From time to time we have issues : the CD is not read by one of the computers, you do not see the DLA drive in the Sent To menu, you cannot eject the CD, the computer is blocked... I tried to format one CD on one computer (and burn data to the CD only from the computer where it has been formatted), seems better but always the same issues...
Question is : is DLA reliable enough to do such a data transfer ? My feeling would be to use the DLA CD or DVD as another "hard disk", that is mounted and not often dismounted... Or should we use the Windows XP drag and drop feature ?
Thanks for your comments.
Regards,
Luuke
IMHO, if the pc's have USB connectors, I'd be using jump drives instead (flash drive, thumb drive, pick any of the many names for them). They're much more reliable and convenient.
Larry
Registered Member Creator 2010 Pro, Creator 2009 Ultimate, EMC 10, 9, 8 Deluxe, 7.5, 7, ECDC 6,5,4
Dell Precision WorkStation 450 / 2 - Intel Xeon 2.80ghz CPU w/HT, 512mb L2 Cache, 533mhz Bus / 2gb RAM / 1800gb+ HDD's / NVIDIA GeForce 6200 / Lite-On 165H6S CD DVD+/- DVD+/-DL / Plextor PX-708UF / Hauppage WinTV HVR-950Q / Hauppage WinTV PVR PCI II 250 / Hauppage WinTV PVR USB2 / XP Pro SP3 / Windows 7
Registered Member Creator 2010 Pro, Creator 2009 Ultimate, EMC 10, 9, 8 Deluxe, 7.5, 7, ECDC 6,5,4
Dell Precision WorkStation 450 / 2 - Intel Xeon 2.80ghz CPU w/HT, 512mb L2 Cache, 533mhz Bus / 2gb RAM / 1800gb+ HDD's / NVIDIA GeForce 6200 / Lite-On 165H6S CD DVD+/- DVD+/-DL / Plextor PX-708UF / Hauppage WinTV HVR-950Q / Hauppage WinTV PVR PCI II 250 / Hauppage WinTV PVR USB2 / XP Pro SP3 / Windows 7
#4
Posted 20 March 2007 - 12:46 AM
QUOTE (Larry @ Mar 19 2007, 02:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As has been suggested, if you are only doing temporary file transfers, it's ok. But as you are experiencing, packet writing software (which DLA is just one brand of) is not the most reliable beast out there, and they are not interchangeable between brands.
IMHO, if the pc's have USB connectors, I'd be using jump drives instead (flash drive, thumb drive, pick any of the many names for them). They're much more reliable and convenient.
IMHO, if the pc's have USB connectors, I'd be using jump drives instead (flash drive, thumb drive, pick any of the many names for them). They're much more reliable and convenient.
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
Problem is, the second environment is secure and no USB device can be used...
We wanted to use DLA because it should have been faster compared with the XP application...
I will do some tests without DLA and see if it is really longer...
Thanks a lot for your comments !
Luuke
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Roxio Community





