Roxio Community: Internet Explorer 7 Compatiblity - Roxio Community

Jump to content

Roxio Community
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Internet Explorer 7 Compatiblity Roxio refuses to accept responsibility

Poll: Who should fix this? (20 member(s) have cast votes)

Who should accept responsibility to fix this issue?

  1. Microsoft (13 votes [65.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 65.00%

  2. Roxio (7 votes [35.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   GregA 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 29-March 07

Posted 29 March 2007 - 10:53 AM

I have seen dozens of posts regarding this subject and feel compelled to add my comments...

What we have here is two programs that refuse to coexist on one machine; Roxio 7 and IE7.

Roxio refuses to accept any responsibility and places all the blame on Microsoft. I see this as a cop out.
Roxio obviously knows how to make their programs work with IE7 (e.g., Roxio 9.0); but yet steadfastly refuses to fix 7.0.

What I see is a company that is driven by revenue (solution = buy our upgrade) rather than Customer Service.

Sorry Roxio, Microsoft is a bigger market force than you. You're going to have to follow their lead rather than the other way around.
0

#2 User is offline   Beerman 

  • Digital Beer Guru
  • Group: Digital Guru
  • Posts: -8,435
  • Joined: 04-January 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Just outside the Big Easy

Posted 29 March 2007 - 12:18 PM

It was reported today (sorry, don't have the link now) that Symantec 360 stops users from going to many sites such as banks and other financial institutions. In this case, since this program was released AFTER IE6 & 7, it's definitely the fault of Symantec.
EMC7 was released 2 years prior to IE7. I don't see how, even after drinking many beers, Roxio could be blamed for it. Sure, I guess they could go back to Easy Creator 4 too and make it compatible with XP.
Paul
------
Katrina survivor, current BP survivor

Custom Built ASUS M4A79T Deluxe - AMD X4-955-Corsair XMS3 8GB DDR3 Memory-XFX HD-487A-ZHFC Radeon HD 4870 1GB Vid card - Sony & Pioneer DVD Drives-HAF922 Case-1 WD 1TB, 1 Seagate 1TB and 1 Rack Drive-HVR 2250 & HDHomerun Tuners- Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium- Acer H233H monitor-1 ATI DCT-W7 X64 Ultimate
#2-M4A79XTD EVO-AMD X4-925-4GB Corsair Ballistix Tracer DDR3 1600-Antec 750 PSU-Sony DVD/RW-2-1TB HD's- Zalman CNPS9700 LED heatsink-InfiniTV 4 in a Coolermaster 690 II case-W7 x64 Ultimate
0

#3 User is offline   ml 

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Digital Guru
  • Posts: 11,045
  • Joined: 04-January 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 01:06 PM

QUOTE (GregA @ Mar 29 2007, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Roxio obviously knows how to make their programs work with IE7 (e.g., Roxio 9.0); but yet steadfastly refuses to fix 7.0.

Question......

Why didn't Microsoft design Internet Explorer 7 so that it didn't 'break' programs already on the market?

This problem isn't exclusive to Roxio. Internet Explorer also broke lots of other programs and even some Internet Service providers programs.

Why do you think Microsoft is so popular with software development companies? Everytime they come out with a new Operating System, you've got to buy new software that will run on their new Operating System..... and Internet Explorer 7 was developed to work with Windows Vista.

There's an easy fix...... just roll back to Internet Explorer 6 if you want to have your existing programs work correctly. Get good firewall, virus protections, spyware, etc. suite and don't depend on Microsoft to secure your computer from hackers.

This post has been edited by ml: 29 March 2007 - 01:07 PM

ml

flying squirrel......"It's more of a gliding thing....."



Intel® Core™2 Duo 2.2 Ghz desktop processor E4500;
3GB DDR2 memory;
DL DVD±RW/CD-RW drive;
500GB SATA 7200 rpm hard drive;
Windows Vista Home Premium ,
ATI RADEON HD 2400,Built-in TV tuner , High-definition audio (8-speaker support), HDMI
Multiformat media reader,
IEEE 1394 (FireWire) interface and 6 high-speed USB 2.0 ports,
PCI card with 4 USB 2.0 and 2 IEEE 1394 ports,
10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet


0

#4 User is offline   gi7omy 

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Digital Guru
  • Posts: 16,915
  • Joined: 10-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belfast, Ireland

Posted 29 March 2007 - 05:35 PM

Actually if you want a fast browser with tabs that also has the advantage of being compliant with the W3C standards, forget IE entirely and get Firefox.

Oh and it doesn't have Alexa either laugh.gif
If it ain't broke, fiddle with it until it breaks, then fiddle with it until you get it fixed

"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "

"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."

“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe


Daithi

Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor


EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
0

#5 User is offline   lynn98109 

  • Digital Master
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 866
  • Joined: 04-January 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:09 PM

And turn off Microsoft's auto-update. It is entirely possible to go there and check it manually the 2nd Tuesday of the month.

If that's too hard for you, set it to notifiy you when there are updates available.

A friend of mine had it set to download and ask before installing. So the reason his 56k line was going so slow is it shoved down IE 7, WinPlayer 11, and a few other things I don't consider necessary and asked permsision to install.

I suggested going to the download site, and seeing what all it'd downloaded for him. He accepted a security patch, and let the rest go.

Lynn
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users