Most (or is it all?) DVD recorders can burn up to 8 hours onto a DVD without any trouble, whereas EMC 7 struggles to burn more than a couple of hours onto a DVD.
Is it deliberate? In which case, why?
Is the software inferior to that on DVD recorders? Again, in which case, why?
Why are DVD Recorders better at burning than EMC 7?
Started by
tom1805
, Apr 10 2007 10:57 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 10 April 2007 - 10:57 AM
#2
Posted 10 April 2007 - 11:07 AM
QUOTE (tom1805 @ Apr 10 2007, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Most (or is it all?) DVD recorders can burn up to 8 hours onto a DVD without any trouble, whereas EMC 7 struggles to burn more than a couple of hours onto a DVD.
Is it deliberate? In which case, why?
Is the software inferior to that on DVD recorders? Again, in which case, why?
Is it deliberate? In which case, why?
Is the software inferior to that on DVD recorders? Again, in which case, why?
No, the software isn't inferior.
It's an tradeoff of video quality vs. time recorded. Check the documentation on the DVD recorder and I think you'll find that they explain that.
ml
flying squirrel......"It's more of a gliding thing....."
Intel® Core™2 Duo 2.2 Ghz desktop processor E4500;
3GB DDR2 memory;
DL DVD±RW/CD-RW drive;
500GB SATA 7200 rpm hard drive;
Windows Vista Home Premium ,
ATI RADEON HD 2400,Built-in TV tuner , High-definition audio (8-speaker support), HDMI
Multiformat media reader,
IEEE 1394 (FireWire) interface and 6 high-speed USB 2.0 ports,
PCI card with 4 USB 2.0 and 2 IEEE 1394 ports,
10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet
flying squirrel......"It's more of a gliding thing....."
Intel® Core™2 Duo 2.2 Ghz desktop processor E4500;
3GB DDR2 memory;
DL DVD±RW/CD-RW drive;
500GB SATA 7200 rpm hard drive;
Windows Vista Home Premium ,
ATI RADEON HD 2400,Built-in TV tuner , High-definition audio (8-speaker support), HDMI
Multiformat media reader,
IEEE 1394 (FireWire) interface and 6 high-speed USB 2.0 ports,
PCI card with 4 USB 2.0 and 2 IEEE 1394 ports,
10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet
#3
Posted 10 April 2007 - 11:32 AM
QUOTE (ml @ Apr 10 2007, 08:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No, the software isn't inferior.
It's an tradeoff of video quality vs. time recorded. Check the documentation on the DVD recorder and I think you'll find that they explain that.
It's an tradeoff of video quality vs. time recorded. Check the documentation on the DVD recorder and I think you'll find that they explain that.
Yes, I realise that there's no such thing as a free lunch, but my point is that if you're willing to accept an inferior quality a DVD recorder will allow you to put 8 hours on a DVD; Roxio software won't.
For example, sad person that I am
#4
Posted 10 April 2007 - 12:01 PM
QUOTE (tom1805 @ Apr 10 2007, 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes, I realise that there's no such thing as a free lunch, but my point is that if you're willing to accept an inferior quality a DVD recorder will allow you to put 8 hours on a DVD; Roxio software won't.
For example, sad person that I am
, I record The Simpsons, which is broadcast on Channel 4 in the UK. I can put 10 programmes on a DVD, which is about 3.5 hours, and the quality is perfectly acceptable. I can even put 6 episodes of Lost on DVD (about 4 hours without the adverts) and the quality is OK for this purpose. My question is, if my DVD recorder can do it, whay can't EMC 7?
For example, sad person that I am
You are 3 versions behind the times. With V9 you can do this…
Dell 8300 3.0ghz 1.5gb RAM 300gb & 200gb HDs
XP Pro/SP2
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 w/AGP8X
XP Pro/SP2
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 w/AGP8X
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users






