Jump to content

Roxio Community

Need advice on 2 capture methods


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Michaelcz

Michaelcz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:37 AM

I purchased EMC 9 Deluxe in May 2007 for casual editing. For the past month I have read the manual, the pdf guide and about every post that would affect my projects before starting. It has made life easy creating slide shows and mini projects.

In the past I have used MGI Videowave 4 and Pinnacle Studio 7. I did the trials of EMC 9 and Pinnacle Studio 10. By far EMC 9 Deluxe is the easiest and most user friendly.

I have experimented with Chroma key, slides, music and transitions before attacking anything major. Most importantly, reading the posts of the very helpful forum gurus has made it simple. I even got my $60 rebate with no issues.

Now for my question. I own an old Sony Analog 8mm camcorder with tapes I want to edit. I have two methods of bringing it into to my computer. I plan on capturing about 20 minute segments. The first is Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-150 and will bring it in as mpeg2. The second method is Dazzle DVC 90 USB video input which came with the EMC 9 Deluxe. Which method of the 2 would be the best quality to bring my video in for editing? Thanks.

Michael

Edited by Michaelcz, 19 June 2007 - 11:38 AM.


#2 james_hardin

james_hardin

    Digital Guru

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,000 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:51 AM

Have a few DVD RW discs on hand to play with while learning.

Try Both methods and burn projects to the RWs and take them for a test drive. Let us know what method you think works best.
Dell 8300 3.0ghz 1.5gb RAM 300gb & 200gb HDs
XP Pro/SP2
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 w/AGP8X

#3 Michaelcz

Michaelcz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 19 June 2007 - 01:52 PM

QUOTE (james_hardin @ Jun 19 2007, 11:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Have a few DVD RW discs on hand to play with while learning.

Try Both methods and burn projects to the RWs and take them for a test drive. Let us know what method you think works best.


Since video and audio is an imperical judgement call, I figured that I would try that. But I thought someone who had the same type of equipment would know a definitive answer. Whether capturing analog vcr tapes or analog camcorder, which might be best one way or the other described. Thanks.

#4 ggrussell

ggrussell

    Digital Guru

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,581 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 June 2007 - 02:03 PM

Both devices capture to MPEG 2 using built-in hardware encoding.  I would say that the quality would be about the same. However, the Hauppauge is very well supported and the company is good at updating drivers.  Some users have had problems with the Dazzle and even the Pinnacle website states problems with certain USB 2 chipsets.  With my personal experience, you will most likely have less problems with the Hauppauge capture card.
Phenom X4 965 3.4Ghz, 4gig DDR3, LG 47" 3D TV, Hitachi 1TB HD, Seagate 500GB, LiteOn iHBS112 Bluray, TSSTCorp SH-222A DVD, ATI HD3300 IGP, VIA HiDef audio with Logitech Z5500 THX certified 5.1 speakers, Epson 4490 scanner, Canon 9000Pro MarkII printer, Sharp AL1551CS laser printer/copier, Sony TRV740 8mm digital, Canon HV20 HDV camcorder and Fuji S7000 for still photos, Win7 Home Premium
---------
System 2: HP DV7 laptop, Turion II Dual Core 2.4Ghz, 4GB RAM, 640GB hard drive, ATI Mobility HD4650, ATI HiDef Audio, Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.

Gary Russell
TNUSA

#5 Michaelcz

Michaelcz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 19 June 2007 - 02:10 PM

QUOTE (ggrussell @ Jun 19 2007, 02:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Both devices capture to MPEG 2 using built-in hardware encoding.  I would say that the quality would be about the same. However, the Hauppauge is very well supported and the company is good at updating drivers.  Some users have had problems with the Dazzle and even the Pinnacle website states problems with certain USB 2 chipsets.  With my personal experience, you will most likely have less problems with the Hauppauge capture card.


ggrussell --Thanks. That personal experience was what I was looking for. The Dazzle DVC 90 came with the EMC 9 Deluxe. I bought the Deluxe version for the software extras that came with it and not so much for the DVC 90. (the $60 rebate didn't hurt either) I did like the ease of the Hauppauge, but wanted to make sure I was not missing something.

Best Regards,
Michael

#6 sknis

sknis

    Digital Guru

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,950 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 June 2007 - 02:43 PM

QUOTE (Michaelcz @ Jun 19 2007, 05:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ggrussell --Thanks. That personal experience was what I was looking for. The Dazzle DVC 90 came with the EMC 9 Deluxe. I bought the Deluxe version for the software extras that came with it and not so much for the DVC 90. (the $60 rebate didn't hurt either) I did like the ease of the Hauppauge, but wanted to make sure I was not missing something.

Best Regards,
Michael


My personal experience only.  If I capture with a A/D card and my sound card, I have to limit captures to about 10 minutes or I get the Audio/Video sync problem.  If I use the DVC 90, I do not have the sync problem even after one hour but I think the video is slightly less sharp.  That's why you have to check yourself.  Capture was from a video cassette (VHS) player.
Regardless of what I say about computer maintenance, there is no need to defrag a solid state hard drive.

PC  Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit  
Velocity Micro ProMagix ©HD 60; evga x58 motherboard, Intel i7 @2.93, 12G RAM, EVGA Nvidia 560TI superclocked video card, SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme audio card, Buffalo external blu-ray burner; Creator 2012. PhotoShow 6, VHS to DVD 3Plus.

Laptop - Windows 7 Home
Dell XPS 1645, Intel I7 1,6G with overdrive ,4G RAM, 1 GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730, Sound Blaster X-Fi MB Panzer, 500G hard drive.

Apple =OSX 10.5
MacBook Pro; 15.4-inch widescreen display, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB memory, 200GB hard drive, 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW), NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT with 256MB of GDDR3 memory.  ILife 08, Toast 10, Final Cut Express 4 and Photoshop 4.

#7 Michael_j

Michael_j

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 19 June 2007 - 03:40 PM

QUOTE (sknis @ Jun 19 2007, 02:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My personal experience only.  If I capture with a A/D card and my sound card, I have to limit captures to about 10 minutes or I get the Audio/Video sync problem.  If I use the DVC 90, I do not have the sync problem even after one hour but I think the video is slightly less sharp.  That's why you have to check yourself.  Capture was from a video cassette (VHS) player.


I think I will go ahead and try both ways. It make take some time to report back, but I will. Thanks.

Michael

#8 mikiem

mikiem

    Apprentice

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 119 posts

Posted 25 June 2007 - 12:04 PM

If it helps anyone...

Video & Audio capture use different timing clocks, different sampling freq. and so on, so most capture hardware alters either the video or audio timing very subtly to maintain sync. Capturing audio separately can come in handy [i.e. recording from the SPDIF of the cable/sat box], but the result can need very serious editing throughout, time stretching or compressing about every 10 minutes as noted by sknis. Normally you always want to plug both audio and video into your capture hardware.

RE: Capturing VHS or SVHS video...
Because these formats actually hold less data than something like DV or current mpg2, there's a bit of debate on how nuts one should go trying to preserve or enhance quality. That said, many people capture to avi using something like mjpeg or HUFFYUV, and using DGIndex with captured mpg2 is also popular. A program called Avisynth can handle avi files or DGIndex files, and allow you to apply your choice of many, many filters that these folks feel greatly enhance the original video quality. Others use VFAPI or Avisynth to bring the video into VirtualDub: a more user friendly alternative that also has many enhancing filters available.

While EMC9's Media Import uses software mpg2, there are other capture apps available, some for free, that allow avi capture, including I think many that will work with the DVC90.

#9 Larry

Larry

    Digital Guru

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,193 posts

Posted 25 June 2007 - 01:08 PM

QUOTE (mikiem @ Jun 25 2007, 03:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
........While EMC9's Media Import uses software mpg2, there are other capture apps available, some for free, that allow avi capture, including I think many that will work with the DVC90.
EMC 9 supports capturing DVI-AVI also, provided one has the proper hardware and drivers for it.

BTW, an "avi" file can contain many differnt types of video, some highly compressed, like Xvid and Divx, and others uncompressed, like DV-AVI.
Larry
Registered Member Creator 2010 Pro, Creator 2009 Ultimate, EMC 10, 9, 8 Deluxe, 7.5, 7, ECDC 6,5,4

Dell Precision WorkStation 450 / 2 - Intel Xeon 2.80ghz CPU w/HT, 512mb L2 Cache, 533mhz Bus / 2gb RAM / 1800gb+ HDD's / NVIDIA GeForce 6200 / Lite-On 165H6S CD DVD+/- DVD+/-DL /  Plextor PX-708UF /
Hauppage WinTV HVR-950Q / Hauppage WinTV PVR PCI II 250 / Hauppage WinTV PVR USB2 / XP Pro SP3 / Windows 7




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users