Help! cannot get rid of roxio
#1
Posted 14 September 2007 - 01:57 PM
This is the worst freakin program ever.. wtg with the patch
how do i remove this thing without formating my hard drive
PKing
#2
Posted 14 September 2007 - 02:04 PM
cd
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Computer Specs click show.
1.Click here Beginners Guide - Blank DVD Media Type Definitions & What A Firmware Upgrade Is for Your Burner.
2.Click here Firmware HQ - site dedicated to providing you with the latest firmware releases for your optical disc drives.
3.Click here CD-DVD Speed
4.Click here CD-DVD Speed - A user guide
5.Click here Enabling/Checking DMA in Windows Vista, XP, 2000, Me, 9x.
6.Click hereYou can no longer access the CD drive or the DVD drive.
7.click here Drive Not Recognized By Roxio, PX Engine 3_00_58a. Old Version<-> EMC 7.5 Up PX Engine 4.18.16a. Update .Click here
8.Click here How to uninstall IE 7 and WMP 11.
9.Click here ImgBurn Current version: 2.5.3.0 (5,262 KB) CD / DVD / HD DVD / Blu-ray burning application
10.Click here InfoTool (Drive, Disk, Configuration, Software, Hardware, DMA settings, etc.).
11.Click here. Complete Uninstall of Creator 2011 & Creator 2012
12.Click here. Complete Uninstall of Creator 2009 and 2010 (Windows Vista and 7)
13.Click here Complete Uninstall of Creator 2009 and 2010 (Windows XP)
14.Click here Complete Uninstall of Easy Media Creator 9 & 10 on Windows Vista
15.Click here Complete Uninstall of Easy Media Creator 7.5, 8, 9, & 10 on Windows XP
16. Click here WinZip Data Compression Utility <> Click here WinRAR Data Compression Utility Click here 7-Zip Data Compression Utility
17. Click here Finding Your Computer Specs And Roxio Software Version Number.
#3
Posted 14 September 2007 - 02:04 PM
#4
Posted 14 September 2007 - 02:20 PM
After about 8 months and a new roxio version, you would of thought they might have an idea about how to fix this thing.
and no its not my computer.. Every other program I have runs fine...
so its your software
PKing
#5
Posted 15 September 2007 - 03:35 AM
After about 8 months and a new roxio version, you would of thought they might have an idea about how to fix this thing.
and no its not my computer.. Every other program I have runs fine...
so its your software
PKing
I had the same problem . I can't recommend the 9.1 update. But I did follow the instructions for a clean install and it worked . . except I had to contact support for how to get rid of the invalid serial number error. It works fine for me now as 9.0 plus dla patch.
#6
Posted 15 September 2007 - 03:37 AM
After about 8 months and a new roxio version, you would of thought they might have an idea about how to fix this thing.
and no its not my computer.. Every other program I have runs fine...
so its your software
PKing
No it is your computer, sad to say…
If it were the software don't you think that millions of users would all have the same problem?
Reformatting is easy, but reinstalling all our junk is always a pain! I suggest this, shop around and get yourself a new HD of equal or larger size than what you have now.
Put in the new HD format and install EMC9. Then install just what you really use ~ this is an opportunity to clean house…
After all is up and running, install your Old HD as a secondary and copy your various info back to your new HD.
After a month or 2, either format the old HD and keep it as a spare or format and use it for data storage.
It is a way of making the best of a bad situation.
XP Pro/SP2
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 w/AGP8X
#7
Posted 15 September 2007 - 09:55 AM
If it were the software don't you think that millions of users would all have the same problem?
Reformatting is easy, but reinstalling all our junk is always a pain! I suggest this, shop around and get yourself a new HD of equal or larger size than what you have now.
Put in the new HD format and install EMC9. Then install just what you really use ~ this is an opportunity to clean house…
After all is up and running, install your Old HD as a secondary and copy your various info back to your new HD.
After a month or 2, either format the old HD and keep it as a spare or format and use it for data storage.
It is a way of making the best of a bad situation.
It is the software "sad to say." As I have stated the computer that it has failed on is Vista 64. If you looked at any of the other threads, you would notice that many other people have had the upgrade for them running 64 bit vista. "Millions of users" do not have the same problem because there are many people that run diffrent versions of Windows. I said a couple times that my laptop that runs 32 bit vista has had the patch install correctly, albeit was the second time around. The 64 bit version it failed 3 times in a row. I reformated windows. BTW as a side. it sucks to try to clean install if you buy the upgrade version of microshaft. On the phone with tech support. My daughter sat on my copy of xp pro and broke the cd so I cannot use that to install first.
Anyway, I know you want to help, but I do not see how buying another hard drive is going to help at all. This is a software issue from a copy that does not seem to care. I have posted the exact error code that completely messed up my system. If there was a hardware problem, I would be having problems with other software. That is not the case, all of my other software works fine. I think the 200gig hd I have is more than enough to hold a version of roxio...
PKing
#8
Posted 15 September 2007 - 12:31 PM
Anyway, I know you want to help, but I do not see how buying another hard drive is going to help at all. This is a software issue from a copy that does not seem to care. I have posted the exact error code that completely messed up my system. If there was a hardware problem, I would be having problems with other software. That is not the case, all of my other software works fine. I think the 200gig hd I have is more than enough to hold a version of roxio...
PKing
There is a very good way to install an upgrade version of Vista, either 32 bit or 64 bit, and do a "really clean install" without installing a previous version first. A majority of Vista problems result from installing over an existing Windows operating system.
Start with a reformatted HDD, or at least with a HDD that has no operating system installed.
Insert the Vista DVD and let the install begin. You will reach a screen that asks if you want to do a custom install, or some phrase similar to that. Say yes.
It will then request that you enter the product code, but it gives an option to install without entering the product code. Chose not to enter the product code. The install will complete. Reboot with the DVD in the drive.
As it boots up chose to boot from the DVD drive. Install Vista again. This time chose "upgrade" and enter the product code. The install will complete and the computer now has a "clean install of Vista".
This is undocumented by Microsoft, but a tech support gave me the procedure after I had devoted about 16 hours with several tech support people in trying to get a good install of Vista.
I hope when Microsoft issues SP1 they return to the install procedure they previously used where you can insert a CD of a previous version during the install to prove that this install is an upgrade, without having to actually install the previous version.
BTW, those of us using Vista 64 bit cannot use the EMC9.1 update. I tried, and so have many other posts in this forum. I have not seen a single success reported!
Edited by Goodwin, 15 September 2007 - 12:40 PM.
#9
Posted 15 September 2007 - 12:54 PM
It's very unlikely that you ever will - people don't come here to say they have it working (just if they don't)
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#10
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:01 PM
To define bad.. If you cannot install a program, then the program is by default no good.
My only saving grace is that I just bought a laptopthat this program installed on. Otherwise, I would still be stuck with software that has been unuseable since I bought it in Feb. Now, I have not tested any programs on the laptop yet, I just know it installed.
PKing
#11
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:06 PM
It just means computer 100 has another problem
btw - do you seriously expect MS tech support to admit that their darling new shiny OS may just be buggy? To be honest, I see no need at present for running a 64 bit OS in the normal environment - look just how many programs install in C:\Program Files compared to the number in the x86 Program Files.
Before you ask - I do run a 64 bit OS here (not Vista 64 - but 32 Ultimate) but XP 64 and also Gentoo compiled for 64 bit (and at least it's apps ARE 64 bit optimised)
EMC installed fine and ran fine on all three MS OSs
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#12
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:06 PM
To define bad.. If you cannot install a program, then the program is by default no good.
My only saving grace is that I just bought a laptopthat this program installed on. Otherwise, I would still be stuck with software that has been unuseable since I bought it in Feb. Now, I have not tested any programs on the laptop yet, I just know it installed.
PKing
Since you were able to install this program on your laptop then (according to your logic
Walt
Dell Dimension 4500S;Windows XP Home Edition SP3; Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 2.00GHz, 784MB RAM
(NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200, 128 MB memory disabled because of failure)
Intel® 82845G/GL/GE/PE/GV Graphics Controller; DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
SoundMAX Digital Audio
SamsunG CDR/DVD-ROm SM 332B
HLDS GSA-5120D External LG Super-Multi ReWriter
WDC WD400BB-75DEA0, 40 GB HD; Prolific PL3507 Combo External Hard Drive, 80 GB; Maxtor 6 L200R0 USB Hard Drive, 250GB
HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook; Intel Duo CPU 64 bit, T6400 @ 2.0Ghz; 4.0 GB RAM; Vista Home Premium 64bit
Toshiba MK3252GSX ATA 286GB hard drive; HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T50L ATA burner
Intel 4Series Express Chipset
#13
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:11 PM
I disagreed with your contention.
I have read, with envy, many posts of Vista 32 bit users, who have reported success with the 9.1 update.
#14
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:20 PM
I repeat - people who do NOT have problems very seldom come here to say they don't
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#15
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:24 PM
There is a problem when people pick and choose what they want to use for thier argument. Yes, according to my arguement the program (if it works... I repetely said I have not tested it yet) is great on my 32 bit laptop.
However, the program does not work on my 64 bit vista DISPITE Roxio's claim that this progarm is vista certified. They dont claim vista 32 bit only cert. It does not matter if people believe there is no reason for people to install the 64 bit version of windows. IT is simply not there concern. I bought program that stated it was able to be run on that system, and I expect that to be true.
Maybe in feb you could argue that vista changed something in a patch that messed up roxio.. However, this is a half a year after. There is just no excuse
PKing
#16
Posted 15 September 2007 - 01:57 PM
http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00001.htm
"No automatic registry and file redirection, which is what 32-bit Vista uses to allow existing software to work with Vista's better user account security, even if the software wants to do admin-rights stuff to the registry and Program Files directory. Many apps still break in 32-bit Vista, but many more break in the 64-bit version....There are software incompatibility problems for Vista, too, but apart from the 16-bit-apps thing they're not specific to 64-bit Vista. They're largely restricted to software that wants to do relatively low-level stuff, like CD/DVD burning programs and programs that tweak system settings."
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc2c8ad
"When you install Adobe Acrobat, one of the following issues occurs:
-- The Acrobat installer returns the error message, "Warning 20225: Adobe Acrobat 8 Setup was unable to create a new item: Adobe PDF Converter. The Adobe PDF Printer may be unavailable. GetLastError: The specified module could not be found." When you click OK, the installer returns the error again and completes the installation, but the Adobe PDF printer doesn't appear in Printers And Faxes in the Windows Control Panel.
-- The Adobe PDF printer doesn't appear in Printers And Faxes in the Windows Control Panel. "
http://coderjournal.com/2007/03/apple-want...install-itunes/
"iTunes could not be installed because Visual Basic Script (VBScript) is not installed or has been disabled. Make sure VBScript is installed, turn off script blocking in anti-virus and personal firewall software, re-register VBScript, and then install iTunes."
Those are just three hits on common apps struggling on Vista 64 from Google - there are a LOT more out there
Vista is proving so successful that Vienna (MS code for the Longhorn replacement) will be out in 2009 (less than 2 years away)
Edited by gi7omy, 15 September 2007 - 02:00 PM.
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users






