Roxio Community: Is Toast 8 JAM Red Book Compliant? - Roxio Community

Jump to content

Roxio Community
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is Toast 8 JAM Red Book Compliant? Want to make audio CDR for glass master replication

#1 User is offline   mgk 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 29-November 07

Posted 29 November 2007 - 03:10 PM

I want to create a CDR for commercial audio glass master replication. This must include P and Q subcode information, including ISRC info, etc., etc.

I believe with previous versions of JAM this was possible. However, I have heard nothing about Toast 8 boasting Red Book Compliance with the newest included JAM software.

Can anyone tell me with certainty if newest Toast/JAM is red book compliant?

Since I'm mixing down audio in protools and running on intelmac, my alternative to burning software would be Bias Peak LE, but rather go with Toast/Jam, IF it can do what Peak LE can in terms of Red Book specs. Suggestions?
0

#2 User is offline   John Link 

  • Rookie
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 11-July 06

Posted 03 January 2008 - 05:04 PM

It might be better to ask your queston in the Toast forum.

John Link
0

#3 User is offline   freshburn 

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,813
  • Joined: 04-January 06

Posted 03 January 2008 - 06:38 PM

Yes it is.
0

#4 User is offline   lush1 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 09-February 08

Posted 09 February 2008 - 01:31 PM

Toast 8 is not a pro mastering app. It does not have provisions for saving a text file for printing the PQ subcodes. Roxio put some of the Jam features into Toast 8, but they left some of the pro features out. It's sad. I wish Roxio would bring out a new and improved version of Jam, or at least put ALL of Jam's features into Toast 8.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users