Jump to content

Roxio Community

Easy Media Creator Performance


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 jerry419

jerry419

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 22 December 2007 - 04:09 AM

I have been a users of Easy Creator 7.5, 8, 9, and now 10.  I am running a Vista home brew with 2.4ghz quad processor (1066 FSB), 2gb ram, all SATA hard drives (7200rpm), all SATA DVD Burners.  Version 10 performance is unacceptable.  When I finish posting this, I plan to uninstall and try V9.  I will keep watching, here, for solutions to this problem.  This sort of situation is very typical of Roxio (no)support.

#2 james_hardin

james_hardin

    Digital Guru

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,000 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 December 2007 - 04:36 AM

QUOTE (jerry419 @ Dec 22 2007, 07:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have been a users of Easy Creator 7.5, 8, 9, and now 10.  I am running a Vista home brew with 2.4ghz quad processor (1066 FSB), 2gb ram, all SATA hard drives (7200rpm), all SATA DVD Burners.  Version 10 performance is unacceptable.  When I finish posting this, I plan to uninstall and try V9.  I will keep watching, here, for solutions to this problem.  This sort of situation is very typical of Roxio (no)support.

Must be your setup…

Everyone else has commented that EMC 10 is as fast or faster than V9…

List your Video Card and the settings you are using. (assumes you are referring to video work as you never bothered to say)
Dell 8300 3.0ghz 1.5gb RAM 300gb & 200gb HDs
XP Pro/SP2
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 w/AGP8X

#3 sknis

sknis

    Digital Guru

  • Digital Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,941 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 December 2007 - 05:31 AM

QUOTE (james_hardin @ Dec 22 2007, 06:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Must be your setup…

Everyone else has commented that EMC 10 is as fast or faster than V9…

List your Video Card and the settings you are using. (assumes you are referring to video work as you never bothered to say)

The poster also failed to tell us what was unacceptable -- quality or speed or applications or interface or installation or ...?  Also he mentions support but doesn't even tell us what question he did/did not get an answer to.

Edited by sknis, 22 December 2007 - 05:33 AM.

Regardless of what I say about computer maintenance, there is no need to defrag a solid state hard drive.

PC  Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit  
Velocity Micro ProMagix ©HD 60; evga x58 motherboard, Intel i7 @2.93, 12G RAM, EVGA Nvidia 560TI superclocked video card, SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme audio card, Buffalo external blu-ray burner; Creator 2012. PhotoShow 6, VHS to DVD 3Plus.

Laptop - Windows 7 Home
Dell XPS 1645, Intel I7 1,6G with overdrive ,4G RAM, 1 GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730, Sound Blaster X-Fi MB Panzer, 500G hard drive.

Apple =OSX 10.5
MacBook Pro; 15.4-inch widescreen display, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB memory, 200GB hard drive, 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW), NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT with 256MB of GDDR3 memory.  ILife 08, Toast 10, Final Cut Express 4 and Photoshop 4.

#4 lynn98109

lynn98109

    Digital Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 866 posts

Posted 22 December 2007 - 06:09 AM

Since he's got Vista, hope he updates EMC 9 to EMC 9.1 before doing too much else ...  huh.gif

Lynn

#5 telhack

telhack

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:47 PM

I have to agree on the performance issue with relation to speed compared to 5, 6, and 7.5.   I find this program to be rather slow.  Also it doesn't seem as friendly to use.  I hate reading, I like to fire up the app and play.  If I got to read the book its either too difficult or something special.
For example I miss being able to tag the first jpeg in a slideshow, instead I have to drag it to the first spot.  Not a big deal since the first slide is would be the first one, but it sure would speed things up instead of dragging in a large production.  Maybe that can be added in an update.  You tag the first one and the app moves it by itself.
Was having trouble with dragging until I noticed that I have to watch the icon!!!!  Was not looking for that.  It goes from a Circle with a bar in it to a small box when it is ok to drop.  You have to watch for that.  Not sure why though.  It isn't like you can drop a image inside another one so what's the point except to cause trouble for someone who isn't paying attention! :-)

I am also running a homebrew with Vista Business, an Intel Core 2 Duo at 2.3, dual hard drives at RAID1 300Gb, dual BFG7900 GTO 512mb SLI PCIexpress cards(however, they are not sharing the load - NVIDIA forgets to mention in the literature before you buy it that you cannot run 2 SLI boards and have dual displays how convenient- should have done more homework!), and 4 GB DDR2 3200 memory.  The applications withing the initial software window load slowly especially Videowave.

At the moment I am trying to create a slideshow using Photo slideshow and I am importing approx 230 images at one time.  It has been 30 minutes now and I have yet to see anything happening.  I don't have control of the program since it is apparently trying to bring in the jpegs.  It has a small status box that came up and said something like "please wait importing or copying picture #" but it did not stay there long and dissappeared.  It never came back.  This has happened on several slideshow creations.  
A status indicator would be great and perhaps with an estimated time to import the images would be helpful.

Does anyone know the approx import time to complete on 1 picture?  Knowing this I can then calculate the amount of time to expect the task to complete.
I read on another post that the MyDVD slideshow performs differently or at least a slideshow created in MyDVD cannot be edited from within Videowave.  I wish I knew this before making the slideshow.  I had to recreate it again to edit the pan & tilt cutting off people's heads with some of the settings.  Maybe it shouldn't be called slideshow since at least I assumed I could edit a slideshow from anywhere in the program since the program is made by the same company.  
I await any suggestions as to what I might be doing wrong, etc.

Edited by telhack, 03 January 2008 - 09:45 PM.


#6 Beerman

Beerman

    Digital Beer Guru

  • Digital Guru
  • -8,339 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Just outside the Big Easy

Posted 04 January 2008 - 05:25 AM

Parts of Vista run a tad bit slower for me while other programs run faster.  I have done some very simple tests on the same machine (dual boot) using the same file and found Vista faster with v9 in almost every category.  I have not tried v10 but it appears to me to be the same.  I'm not sure if they've changed or tweaked the encoders in MyDVD/Videowave but I think they might be a tad bit slower but also a tad bit improved in quality.
I haven't done a slide show with the number of images you have in a while and not in v10 but have done a few with just under 100 and what I got was not slow and I think 30 minutes is way out of line.  Something does seem to be wrong to me.
Paul
------
Katrina survivor, current BP survivor

Custom Built ASUS M4A79T Deluxe - AMD X4-955-Corsair XMS3 8GB DDR3  Memory-XFX HD-487A-ZHFC Radeon HD 4870 1GB Vid card - Sony & Pioneer  DVD Drives-HAF922 Case-1 WD 1TB, 1 Seagate 1TB and 1 Rack Drive-HVR  2250 & HDHomerun Tuners- Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium- Acer  H233H monitor-1 ATI DCT-W7 X64 Ultimate
#2-M4A79XTD EVO-AMD  X4-925-4GB Corsair Ballistix Tracer DDR3 1600-Antec 750 PSU-Sony  DVD/RW-2-1TB HD's- Zalman CNPS9700 LED heatsink-InfiniTV 4 in a  Coolermaster 690 II case-W7 x64 Ultimate




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users