I have the retail version 9.0 suite and I have vista.
So I am able to use 9.1 update, right? WRONG !!!
9.1 uninstalled all my 9.0 and started to install 9.1 and then half way it said
installation was interrupted and stopped.
Did anybody ever install the 9.1 successfully?
Some of the programs in 9.0 work with my Vista but most of them don't.
I think this is a very bad program.
0
Installing 9.1 update
Started by
FIREFLY
, Dec 30 2007 01:04 PM
4 replies to this topic
#2
grandpabruce
-
- Digital Guru
-
- 19,446 posts
Digital Guru
- Gender:Male
Posted 30 December 2007 - 01:13 PM
QUOTE (FIREFLY @ Dec 30 2007, 03:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have the retail version 9.0 suite and I have vista.
So I am able to use 9.1 update, right? WRONG !!!
9.1 uninstalled all my 9.0 and started to install 9.1 and then half way it said
installation was interrupted and stopped.
Did anybody ever install the 9.1 successfully?
Some of the programs in 9.0 work with my Vista but most of them don't.
I think this is a very bad program.
So I am able to use 9.1 update, right? WRONG !!!
9.1 uninstalled all my 9.0 and started to install 9.1 and then half way it said
installation was interrupted and stopped.
Did anybody ever install the 9.1 successfully?
Some of the programs in 9.0 work with my Vista but most of them don't.
I think this is a very bad program.
If you had any Roxio resources, running in your tray, that might be the reason that it happened. If you try it again, make sure that you disable all Roxio, via msconfig, then reboot before you try installing the 9.1 patch.
Life is good!
GrandpaBruce
Vietnam Vet - 1970 - 1971
Main System:
ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX Intel Motherboard; Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 3GB (3 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866
PLEXTOR Black DVD Burner, Model PX-880SA; Pioneer Black 8X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R Burner
XFX HD-489A-ZDFC Radeon HD 4890 1GB Video Card
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series Sound Card
Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Backup Computer:
ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe
Windows 7 Pro w/SP1
GrandpaBruce
Vietnam Vet - 1970 - 1971
Main System:
ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX Intel Motherboard; Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 3GB (3 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866
PLEXTOR Black DVD Burner, Model PX-880SA; Pioneer Black 8X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R Burner
XFX HD-489A-ZDFC Radeon HD 4890 1GB Video Card
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series Sound Card
Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Backup Computer:
ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe
Windows 7 Pro w/SP1
#3
FIREFLY
-
- Members
-
- 3 posts
Newbie
Posted 30 December 2007 - 02:50 PM
Thanks grandpa.
I started with clean install. Disabled everything with msconfig and tried 3 times with same results.
One thing I am curious about is the 9.1 patch will start up with inputting the serial number that comes
with my HP desktop computer instead of asking for the CD Key # of the retail version. The retail version
only has CD key # but no serial #.
Can it be that the serial # denote a non-retail version and that is why the patch won't work?
I did a clean install to start. Including doing the regedit routines etc. but the old serial # still comes up
when I tried the patch. Did I miss something in the regedit?
The clean install of the 9.0 did ask for the CD Key # but the patch never ask for that CD key # instead
coming up with the old serial #. Do you think that has something to do with it?
Thanks.
I started with clean install. Disabled everything with msconfig and tried 3 times with same results.
One thing I am curious about is the 9.1 patch will start up with inputting the serial number that comes
with my HP desktop computer instead of asking for the CD Key # of the retail version. The retail version
only has CD key # but no serial #.
Can it be that the serial # denote a non-retail version and that is why the patch won't work?
I did a clean install to start. Including doing the regedit routines etc. but the old serial # still comes up
when I tried the patch. Did I miss something in the regedit?
The clean install of the 9.0 did ask for the CD Key # but the patch never ask for that CD key # instead
coming up with the old serial #. Do you think that has something to do with it?
Thanks.
#4
gi7omy
-
- Digital Guru
-
- 16,976 posts
Digital Guru
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belfast, Ireland
Posted 30 December 2007 - 03:03 PM
That's what it looks like - it's 'seeing' the old HP version and not the new one.
You may have to do a bit of ferreting round the registry and really scrubbing it to get rid of that but that's something I can't really give a lot of advice on (not having any OEM version here to try)
You may have to do a bit of ferreting round the registry and really scrubbing it to get rid of that but that's something I can't really give a lot of advice on (not having any OEM version here to try)
If it ain't broke, fiddle with it until it breaks, then fiddle with it until you get it fixed
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#5
wadesh
-
- Members
-
- 1 posts
Newbie
Posted 28 January 2008 - 05:56 PM
QUOTE (gi7omy @ Dec 30 2007, 03:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's what it looks like - it's 'seeing' the old HP version and not the new one.
You may have to do a bit of ferreting round the registry and really scrubbing it to get rid of that but that's something I can't really give a lot of advice on (not having any OEM version here to try)
You may have to do a bit of ferreting round the registry and really scrubbing it to get rid of that but that's something I can't really give a lot of advice on (not having any OEM version here to try)
FIREFLY, if you find a solution that works, please post back. I'm having the identical issue you are having but on a Dell system.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
