Getting Emc 8 Sorted Out....any News Yet?
#1
Posted 24 March 2006 - 09:46 AM
What we like about EMC 8 so far (not that all of this is working just yet - we trust it will eventually be, after the PATCH), is the following:
* Video in video - wow, what potential. EMC 7 missed this severely.
* Easier and more powerfull panning and zooming in Video editing (not yet working on our version)
* Media Manager's organization methods
* Faster rendering and burning
What we do not like is:
* Instabillity - hanging up every few minutes. EMC 7 use to run as stable as a rock on my system.
* Weird syncronization problems - works fine for a while, then sound and video starts to go their own way
* Video quality of rendered product - Our first DVD indicated that comparative quality with EMC 7 is not as good (actually bad).
* Slow, very slow to work with - EMC 7 is much faster.
* Obvious glitches in program interface - too many to mention (can write DVD from DVD builder, but can not when using Videowave link to DVD Builder etc, etc)
Wel, not to overdo the complaints, I stop here with the EMC 8 negatives - when first I purchased EMC 7, it was as bad as EMC 8 is now, but after their 120 MB update PATCH, it all came right.
So I am still hopefull for Roxio / Sonic on EMC 8 - my question is however, does anybody know when this long expected PATCH will be available - I have purchased the elctronic download version, and see there is only one PATCH out for the early box versions.....
I run an Intell D dual core processor, 2 Gig RAM, ASUS 6800 256 graphics card, twin SATA 300 Gig harddrives, twin DVD LG burners etc etc.
Regards
Francois
#2
Posted 24 March 2006 - 10:53 AM
frpschutte, on Mar 24 2006, 11:46 AM, said:
What we like about EMC 8 so far (not that all of this is working just yet - we trust it will eventually be, after the PATCH), is the following:
* Video in video - wow, what potential. EMC 7 missed this severely.
* Easier and more powerfull panning and zooming in Video editing (not yet working on our version)
* Media Manager's organization methods
* Faster rendering and burning
What we do not like is:
* Instabillity - hanging up every few minutes. EMC 7 use to run as stable as a rock on my system.
* Weird syncronization problems - works fine for a while, then sound and video starts to go their own way
* Video quality of rendered product - Our first DVD indicated that comparative quality with EMC 7 is not as good (actually bad).
* Slow, very slow to work with - EMC 7 is much faster.
* Obvious glitches in program interface - too many to mention (can write DVD from DVD builder, but can not when using Videowave link to DVD Builder etc, etc)
Wel, not to overdo the complaints, I stop here with the EMC 8 negatives - when first I purchased EMC 7, it was as bad as EMC 8 is now, but after their 120 MB update PATCH, it all came right.
So I am still hopefull for Roxio / Sonic on EMC 8 - my question is however, does anybody know when this long expected PATCH will be available - I have purchased the elctronic download version, and see there is only one PATCH out for the early box versions.....
I run an Intell D dual core processor, 2 Gig RAM, ASUS 6800 256 graphics card, twin SATA 300 Gig harddrives, twin DVD LG burners etc etc.
Regards
Francois
I don't know when, or if there will be a patch available for the download version. I do know that some of the missing features are incorporated into EMC 8 Deluxe, which is not a free update.
I agree with you on the video quality of the rendered product. I use EMC 7.5 for my video work. You are wrong about the video in video not being in 7 or 7.5, though. I have put a video on the overlay track of another video more than once, in 7.5. The first was actually two different videos of my parents 50th anniversary, 11 years ago. I inserted and resized one of the videos on an overlay of the other.
Edited by grandpabruce, 24 March 2006 - 11:00 AM.
GrandpaBruce
Vietnam Vet - 1970 - 1971
Main System:
ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX Intel Motherboard; Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 3GB (3 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866
PLEXTOR Black DVD Burner, Model PX-880SA; Pioneer Black 8X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R Burner
XFX HD-489A-ZDFC Radeon HD 4890 1GB Video Card
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series Sound Card
Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Backup Computer:
ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe
Windows 7 Pro w/SP1
#3
Posted 24 March 2006 - 10:58 AM
I feel it offers a great value.
------
Katrina survivor, current BP survivor
Custom Built ASUS M4A79T Deluxe - AMD X4-955-Corsair XMS3 8GB DDR3 Memory-XFX HD-487A-ZHFC Radeon HD 4870 1GB Vid card - Sony & Pioneer DVD Drives-HAF922 Case-1 WD 1TB, 1 Seagate 1TB and 1 Rack Drive-HVR 2250 & HDHomerun Tuners- Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium- Acer H233H monitor-1 ATI DCT-W7 X64 Ultimate
#2-M4A79XTD EVO-AMD X4-925-4GB Corsair Ballistix Tracer DDR3 1600-Antec 750 PSU-Sony DVD/RW-2-1TB HD's- Zalman CNPS9700 LED heatsink-InfiniTV 4 in a Coolermaster 690 II case-W7 x64 Ultimate
#4
Posted 24 March 2006 - 12:26 PM
grandpabruce, on Mar 24 2006, 10:53 AM, said:
I agree with you on the video quality of the rendered product. I use EMC 7.5 for my video work. You are wrong about the video in video not being in 7 or 7.5, though. I have put a video on the overlay track of another video more than once, in 7.5. The first was actually two different videos of my parents 50th anniversary, 11 years ago. I inserted and resized one of the videos on an overlay of the other.
I was hoping to hear that I am wrong in as far as the poor rendering quality of EMC 8 is concerned, especially since EMC 7's final result is excellent. Thankyou for correcting me on the issue of "video in video" in EMC 7. I will, once I decide to uninstall EMC 8 and return to EMC 7 for lack of PATCH availability on EMC 8, experiment with the overlaying of 2nd video lines in EMC 7.
Anybody out there at Roxio / Sonic with some inside info on the possibility of a "save the EMC 8" PATCH..... It would at least help to know if no such corrective patch is planned, since I can then stop wasting my time with EMC 8, and proceed with weathering the storm in EMC 7.
pcostanza, on Mar 24 2006, 10:58 AM, said:
I feel it offers a great value.
No doubt that, as far as concept is concerned, the EMC program, in either 7, or 8, is the best integrated package out there. However, since one invest in good video equipment, cameras and projectors to enjoy the fruit of the hours spend editing and rendering, it makes no sense to even contemplate using a product which eventually deliver the goods in a "far from acceptable" state of quality, even if compared with EMC7.
But I really hope Roxio will come through again, and save this great concept for us to be usefull untill 9 appears on the scene. I have spent some time trying many packages out there, even thos at three times the cost of EMC7 & 8, and I just do not get along with the "add on" approach of having multiple different programs popping up all over the show, to do what Roxio does in one package.
#5
Posted 24 March 2006 - 01:44 PM
Version 8 really is a great program. I have both 8.05 Deluxe and version 7.5 on my computer.
GrandpaBruce
Vietnam Vet - 1970 - 1971
Main System:
ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX Intel Motherboard; Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 3GB (3 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866
PLEXTOR Black DVD Burner, Model PX-880SA; Pioneer Black 8X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R Burner
XFX HD-489A-ZDFC Radeon HD 4890 1GB Video Card
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series Sound Card
Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Backup Computer:
ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe
Windows 7 Pro w/SP1
#6
Posted 26 March 2006 - 02:58 PM
You mention a Deluxe version, which I thought was the version with the hardware included. Since I don't need the hardware, it seems unfair to give that version extra software control of the editing process. They should include everything in the Suite package except the hardware, as someone shouldn't be forced to spend an extra $50 on hardware they don't need just to get a few more features. What a ripoff!
frpschutte, on Mar 24 2006, 09:46 AM, said:
What we like about EMC 8 so far (not that all of this is working just yet - we trust it will eventually be, after the PATCH), is the following:
* Video in video - wow, what potential. EMC 7 missed this severely.
* Easier and more powerfull panning and zooming in Video editing (not yet working on our version)
* Media Manager's organization methods
* Faster rendering and burning
What we do not like is:
* Instabillity - hanging up every few minutes. EMC 7 use to run as stable as a rock on my system.
* Weird syncronization problems - works fine for a while, then sound and video starts to go their own way
* Video quality of rendered product - Our first DVD indicated that comparative quality with EMC 7 is not as good (actually bad).
* Slow, very slow to work with - EMC 7 is much faster.
* Obvious glitches in program interface - too many to mention (can write DVD from DVD builder, but can not when using Videowave link to DVD Builder etc, etc)
Wel, not to overdo the complaints, I stop here with the EMC 8 negatives - when first I purchased EMC 7, it was as bad as EMC 8 is now, but after their 120 MB update PATCH, it all came right.
So I am still hopefull for Roxio / Sonic on EMC 8 - my question is however, does anybody know when this long expected PATCH will be available - I have purchased the elctronic download version, and see there is only one PATCH out for the early box versions.....
I run an Intell D dual core processor, 2 Gig RAM, ASUS 6800 256 graphics card, twin SATA 300 Gig harddrives, twin DVD LG burners etc etc.
Regards
Francois
#7
Posted 26 March 2006 - 03:43 PM
jojoand, on Mar 26 2006, 04:58 PM, said:
You mention a Deluxe version, which I thought was the version with the hardware included. Since I don't need the hardware, it seems unfair to give that version extra software control of the editing process. They should include everything in the Suite package except the hardware, as someone shouldn't be forced to spend an extra $50 on hardware they don't need just to get a few more features. What a ripoff!
Don't buy it, then. Pretty simple.
GrandpaBruce
Vietnam Vet - 1970 - 1971
Main System:
ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX Intel Motherboard; Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 3GB (3 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866
PLEXTOR Black DVD Burner, Model PX-880SA; Pioneer Black 8X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R Burner
XFX HD-489A-ZDFC Radeon HD 4890 1GB Video Card
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series Sound Card
Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Backup Computer:
ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe
Windows 7 Pro w/SP1
#8
Posted 27 March 2006 - 06:48 AM
grandpabruce, on Mar 26 2006, 03:43 PM, said:
May be the deluxe version is the one that works and the standard version is the paid-for beta.
Am I wrong or does this company have a habit of putting out versions that almost do what you want and then you pay another lump to get the proper version that the basic version should have been in the first place. Am I right in saying that if you buy the basic version and then upgrade to the deluxe that you end up spending more overall?
I am not happy with Sonic/ Roxio and am having a serious look at Nero. I think I will bin Sonic/Roxio.
#9
Posted 27 March 2006 - 06:59 AM
jojoand, on Mar 26 2006, 05:58 PM, said:
Good luck with Nero. They have several versions, too, and their product isn't problem free. Take a look at their user forum. Oh yeah... sorry they don't one.
Edited by ggrussell, 27 March 2006 - 07:00 AM.
---------
System 2: HP DV7 laptop, Turion II Dual Core 2.4Ghz, 4GB RAM, 640GB hard drive, ATI Mobility HD4650, ATI HiDef Audio, Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.
Gary Russell
TNUSA
#10
Posted 27 March 2006 - 07:08 AM
tonyk2001, on Mar 27 2006, 06:48 AM, said:
Am I wrong or does this company have a habit of putting out versions that almost do what you want and then you pay another lump to get the proper version that the basic version should have been in the first place. Am I right in saying that if you buy the basic version and then upgrade to the deluxe that you end up spending more overall?
I am not happy with Sonic/ Roxio and am having a serious look at Nero. I think I will bin Sonic/Roxio.
I agree with you, but I tried out the latest Nero (at least they let you try before you buy, so you aren't stuck with something non-functional) and also had problems, at least on my computer, with some of their newest additions. But it was also an early version of their latest offering. I am only trying to get the EMC program to work well enough to keep it on the computer, and at the present the DVD portion hangs so often that it is unusable, and that is on a machine with a 3.2 Pent4 and almost 1 gig of ram. Grandpabruce suggested I reformat, but I have a very well tuned operating system that I keep cleaned and virus free, plus I reinstall from scratch every so often. And then the topic was closed/frozen. What is that about?
#11
Posted 27 March 2006 - 07:38 AM
Does the ASUS 6800 use the nVidia chipset? If it does, then prehaps the nVidia drivers will work better than the one from ASUS. Make sure you have the FEB2006 release of DirectX, too.
I simply do not have any of the issues you describe in your first post on either of the machines in my signature.
---------
System 2: HP DV7 laptop, Turion II Dual Core 2.4Ghz, 4GB RAM, 640GB hard drive, ATI Mobility HD4650, ATI HiDef Audio, Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.
Gary Russell
TNUSA
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





