Hi
Which upgrade from my E8400 3.0GHz would work better with DVDit Pro 6.4? Dual Core E8600 3.33GHz or Quad Core Q9650 3.0GHz?
Thanks
NBK
Page 1 of 1
Which Processor Upgrade For Dvdit Hd Pro 6.4?
#2
Posted 20 August 2008 - 02:27 PM
It could be a toss up. If you are running multiple programs at the same time, then the quad processor will process more instructions across multiple programs. I would look closely at the processor specs at INTEL. Also, get the best video card you can afford if you don't already have the best.
VISTA Home Premium +SP2 32 bit, Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit sp1 and 64 bit sp1, XP Pro --->multiboot
Creator 2012 Pro + Creator 2011 Blu-ray plugin
DIY Asus P8P67, Intel i7-2600k 4.4 OC'd ghz, Corsair 8gb XMS3 DDR3 1600, NVIDIA 550 TI 1gb, OCZ Vertex 3 120 gb SATA III, dual Hitachi 1.5TB SATA III
HP DV7-4100t Intel i3-M380 2.5 ghz, 4gb, Crucial C300 128 gb SSD
HP DV9700T Duo 2 T9300 2.5 ghz, 4gb, GF 8600m GS 512 mb, TS-L632N DVD/CD
HP e9280t i7-960 3.2 ghz, 12gb, GTX 460 1gb, HP BD-RE BH20L, Vertex 3 120GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium, Sony PS3
Creator 2012 Pro + Creator 2011 Blu-ray plugin
DIY Asus P8P67, Intel i7-2600k 4.4 OC'd ghz, Corsair 8gb XMS3 DDR3 1600, NVIDIA 550 TI 1gb, OCZ Vertex 3 120 gb SATA III, dual Hitachi 1.5TB SATA III
HP DV7-4100t Intel i3-M380 2.5 ghz, 4gb, Crucial C300 128 gb SSD
HP DV9700T Duo 2 T9300 2.5 ghz, 4gb, GF 8600m GS 512 mb, TS-L632N DVD/CD
HP e9280t i7-960 3.2 ghz, 12gb, GTX 460 1gb, HP BD-RE BH20L, Vertex 3 120GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium, Sony PS3
#3
Posted 20 August 2008 - 03:29 PM
I wondered about hat myself until I realised that very few apps take advantage of multi core CPUs.
What does make a big difference however is the amount of Level 2 cache on the cores.
My e6750 outperforms most of the quad core CPUs simply because it has a huge 4 MB L2 cache.
If you can afford it then go for the e series quad core, if not, go for the dual core - just make sure you get the biggest L2 cache available
What does make a big difference however is the amount of Level 2 cache on the cores.
My e6750 outperforms most of the quad core CPUs simply because it has a huge 4 MB L2 cache.
If you can afford it then go for the e series quad core, if not, go for the dual core - just make sure you get the biggest L2 cache available
If it ain't broke, fiddle with it until it breaks, then fiddle with it until you get it fixed
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
"Rincewind could scream for mercy in nineteen languages and just scream in another forty-four "
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that will do them in."
“Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.” — Mitch Ratcliffe
Daithi
Home Brew computer
Intel I7 950 on Gigabyte X58A UD3R mobo
12 GB Three Channel DDRAM
Radeon HD4850 512 MB GDR3 graphics
Signalink USB Audio Codec for ham radio connection
1 x 160 GB, 1 x 330 GB, 1 x 400 GB IDE drives
4 x 250 GB SATA 2
LG HL-DT-ST GGW-H20L BD-RE drive
22" Acer P223W monitor
EMC 7.5 on Windows XP 32 SP3
EMC10 on Windows XP64 SP2
Creator 2011 on Windows 7 Ultimate
ECD6 on Gentoo Linux (running under VMWare)
#4
Posted 20 August 2008 - 04:10 PM
Your E8400 is a very good processor. Try some heavy video and CPU intensive processes and then at the same time look at task master's performance monitor. Are both processors pegged at 100%? If no, then a quad processor will do little improvement for the work that you are doing. Moving up to the E8600 from the E8400 isn't going to buy you much.
Developers are working on multiple cpu video processing programs so in the future mulitple cpus will provide improved benefit.
Think: CPU, MEMORY and I/O ... Improve one and the others then become the bottleneck.
Developers are working on multiple cpu video processing programs so in the future mulitple cpus will provide improved benefit.
Think: CPU, MEMORY and I/O ... Improve one and the others then become the bottleneck.
This post has been edited by Big_Dave: 20 August 2008 - 04:10 PM
VISTA Home Premium +SP2 32 bit, Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit sp1 and 64 bit sp1, XP Pro --->multiboot
Creator 2012 Pro + Creator 2011 Blu-ray plugin
DIY Asus P8P67, Intel i7-2600k 4.4 OC'd ghz, Corsair 8gb XMS3 DDR3 1600, NVIDIA 550 TI 1gb, OCZ Vertex 3 120 gb SATA III, dual Hitachi 1.5TB SATA III
HP DV7-4100t Intel i3-M380 2.5 ghz, 4gb, Crucial C300 128 gb SSD
HP DV9700T Duo 2 T9300 2.5 ghz, 4gb, GF 8600m GS 512 mb, TS-L632N DVD/CD
HP e9280t i7-960 3.2 ghz, 12gb, GTX 460 1gb, HP BD-RE BH20L, Vertex 3 120GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium, Sony PS3
Creator 2012 Pro + Creator 2011 Blu-ray plugin
DIY Asus P8P67, Intel i7-2600k 4.4 OC'd ghz, Corsair 8gb XMS3 DDR3 1600, NVIDIA 550 TI 1gb, OCZ Vertex 3 120 gb SATA III, dual Hitachi 1.5TB SATA III
HP DV7-4100t Intel i3-M380 2.5 ghz, 4gb, Crucial C300 128 gb SSD
HP DV9700T Duo 2 T9300 2.5 ghz, 4gb, GF 8600m GS 512 mb, TS-L632N DVD/CD
HP e9280t i7-960 3.2 ghz, 12gb, GTX 460 1gb, HP BD-RE BH20L, Vertex 3 120GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium, Sony PS3
#5
Posted 21 August 2008 - 06:25 AM
QUOTE (Big_Dave @ Aug 20 2008, 02:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It could be a toss up. If you are running multiple programs at the same time, then the quad processor will process more instructions across multiple programs. I would look closely at the processor specs at INTEL. Also, get the best video card you can afford if you don't already have the best. 
Hi Big Dave,
I have a Nvidia 8800GTS 512Mb video card for now...
NBK
#6
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:32 AM
You have an excellent PC system. Are you having a particular performance issue? There are some 10,000 RPM hard drives that would improve performance if disk I/O is a bottleneck for you. Solid state devices as hard drives once the price comes down will offer even better performance. Improving the I/O response time usually offers the biggest performance improvement and pay back as it's generally the biggest component part of "total thruput or transaction" time. Obviously CPU intensive work would benefit from a faster processor.
VISTA Home Premium +SP2 32 bit, Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit sp1 and 64 bit sp1, XP Pro --->multiboot
Creator 2012 Pro + Creator 2011 Blu-ray plugin
DIY Asus P8P67, Intel i7-2600k 4.4 OC'd ghz, Corsair 8gb XMS3 DDR3 1600, NVIDIA 550 TI 1gb, OCZ Vertex 3 120 gb SATA III, dual Hitachi 1.5TB SATA III
HP DV7-4100t Intel i3-M380 2.5 ghz, 4gb, Crucial C300 128 gb SSD
HP DV9700T Duo 2 T9300 2.5 ghz, 4gb, GF 8600m GS 512 mb, TS-L632N DVD/CD
HP e9280t i7-960 3.2 ghz, 12gb, GTX 460 1gb, HP BD-RE BH20L, Vertex 3 120GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium, Sony PS3
Creator 2012 Pro + Creator 2011 Blu-ray plugin
DIY Asus P8P67, Intel i7-2600k 4.4 OC'd ghz, Corsair 8gb XMS3 DDR3 1600, NVIDIA 550 TI 1gb, OCZ Vertex 3 120 gb SATA III, dual Hitachi 1.5TB SATA III
HP DV7-4100t Intel i3-M380 2.5 ghz, 4gb, Crucial C300 128 gb SSD
HP DV9700T Duo 2 T9300 2.5 ghz, 4gb, GF 8600m GS 512 mb, TS-L632N DVD/CD
HP e9280t i7-960 3.2 ghz, 12gb, GTX 460 1gb, HP BD-RE BH20L, Vertex 3 120GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium, Sony PS3
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Roxio Community






