Which setting should I choose?
General purpose editing Normal quality AVI or Best Quality Mpg2? I keep hearing on here that Avi is better but it says Normal? Dont I want the Best Quality since I havent been able to produce good quality videos using this program?
I tried doing a search on this topic but I keep getting an error...
Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
Capturing Video Off Dv Cam
Started by
asandull
, Apr 10 2006 08:45 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:45 AM
#2
Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:08 AM
That error simply means that the search didn't find anything.
This is one of those posts that will have several dozen opinions.
Some will say mpg2 because it doesn't get re- rendered, some will say AVI because it is more original (compression). and others will say do a custom AVI with the large screen size. Some think that avi reduces the risk of an out of sync problem. Others think that mpg2 is good enough and faster because it is not re-rendered when you go to burn the disc. (normal settings)
There is really no correct answer, it depends what you are doing and what looks good to you, what computer you have and probably a dozen other variables. Try doing a short video with all three and burn to a DVD (RW). Use what looks best to you.
This is one of those posts that will have several dozen opinions.
There is really no correct answer, it depends what you are doing and what looks good to you, what computer you have and probably a dozen other variables. Try doing a short video with all three and burn to a DVD (RW). Use what looks best to you.
asandull, on Apr 10 2006, 11:45 AM, said:
Which setting should I choose?
General purpose editing Normal quality AVI or Best Quality Mpg2? I keep hearing on here that Avi is better but it says Normal? Dont I want the Best Quality since I havent been able to produce good quality videos using this program?
I tried doing a search on this topic but I keep getting an error...
Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
General purpose editing Normal quality AVI or Best Quality Mpg2? I keep hearing on here that Avi is better but it says Normal? Dont I want the Best Quality since I havent been able to produce good quality videos using this program?
I tried doing a search on this topic but I keep getting an error...
Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
Regardless of what I say about computer maintenance, there is no need to defrag a solid state hard drive.
PC Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Velocity Micro ProMagix ©HD 60; evga x58 motherboard, Intel i7 @2.93, 12G RAM, EVGA Nvidia 560TI superclocked video card, SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme audio card, Buffalo external blu-ray burner; Creator 2012. PhotoShow 6, VHS to DVD 3Plus.
Laptop - Windows 7 Home
Dell XPS 1645, Intel I7 1,6G with overdrive ,4G RAM, 1 GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730, Sound Blaster X-Fi MB Panzer, 500G hard drive.
Apple =OSX 10.5
MacBook Pro; 15.4-inch widescreen display, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB memory, 200GB hard drive, 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW), NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT with 256MB of GDDR3 memory. ILife 08, Toast 10, Final Cut Express 4 and Photoshop 4.
PC Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Velocity Micro ProMagix ©HD 60; evga x58 motherboard, Intel i7 @2.93, 12G RAM, EVGA Nvidia 560TI superclocked video card, SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme audio card, Buffalo external blu-ray burner; Creator 2012. PhotoShow 6, VHS to DVD 3Plus.
Laptop - Windows 7 Home
Dell XPS 1645, Intel I7 1,6G with overdrive ,4G RAM, 1 GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730, Sound Blaster X-Fi MB Panzer, 500G hard drive.
Apple =OSX 10.5
MacBook Pro; 15.4-inch widescreen display, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB memory, 200GB hard drive, 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW), NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT with 256MB of GDDR3 memory. ILife 08, Toast 10, Final Cut Express 4 and Photoshop 4.
#3
Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:15 AM
sknis, on Apr 10 2006, 01:08 PM, said:
That error simply means that the search didn't find anything.
This is one of those posts that will have several dozen opinions.
Some will say mpg2 because it doesn't get re- rendered, some will say AVI because it is more original (compression). and others will say do a custom AVI with the large screen size. Some think that avi reduces the risk of an out of sync problem. Others think that mpg2 is good enough and faster because it is not re-rendered when you go to burn the disc. (normal settings)
There is really no correct answer, it depends what you are doing and what looks good to you, what computer you have and probably a dozen other variables. Try doing a short video with all three and burn to a DVD (RW). Use what looks best to you.
This is one of those posts that will have several dozen opinions.
There is really no correct answer, it depends what you are doing and what looks good to you, what computer you have and probably a dozen other variables. Try doing a short video with all three and burn to a DVD (RW). Use what looks best to you.
I'll give that a try. Is there an easy way to explain how I would do a custom AVI with large screen size? The only way I know how to change the setting is to use the drop down under quality.
Thanks for your help.
#4
Posted 10 April 2006 - 12:37 PM
You should also take into consideration what hardware you are using. Some analog capture cards are better at MPEG 1 or 2 than they are at AVI.
Phenom X4 965 3.4Ghz, 4gig DDR3, LG 47" 3D TV, Hitachi 1TB HD, Seagate 500GB, LiteOn iHBS112 Bluray, TSSTCorp SH-222A DVD, ATI HD3300 IGP, VIA HiDef audio with Logitech Z5500 THX certified 5.1 speakers, Epson 4490 scanner, Canon 9000Pro MarkII printer, Sharp AL1551CS laser printer/copier, Sony TRV740 8mm digital, Canon HV20 HDV camcorder and Fuji S7000 for still photos, Win7 Home Premium
---------
System 2: HP DV7 laptop, Turion II Dual Core 2.4Ghz, 4GB RAM, 640GB hard drive, ATI Mobility HD4650, ATI HiDef Audio, Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.
Gary Russell
TNUSA
---------
System 2: HP DV7 laptop, Turion II Dual Core 2.4Ghz, 4GB RAM, 640GB hard drive, ATI Mobility HD4650, ATI HiDef Audio, Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit.
Gary Russell
TNUSA
#5
Posted 10 April 2006 - 02:24 PM
Well, for me AVI won hands down. The quality of this video was very clear and had no problems. The Mpg2 file was shaky and blurred. Huge difference. So for me, Normal quality works better than Best quality... who would have thunk...
Thanks!
Thanks!
Edited by asandull, 10 April 2006 - 02:49 PM.
#6
Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:50 PM
asandull, on Apr 10 2006, 06:24 PM, said:
Well, for me AVI won hands down. The quality of this video was very clear and had no problems. The Mpg2 file was shaky and blurred. Huge difference. So for me, Normal quality works better than Best quality... who would have thunk...
Thanks!
Thanks!
Walt
Dell Dimension 4500S;Windows XP Home Edition SP3; IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 CPU 2.00GHz, 784MB RAM
(NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200, 128 MB memory disabled because of failure)
IntelŪ 82845G/GL/GE/PE/GV Graphics Controller; DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
SoundMAX Digital Audio
SamsunG CDR/DVD-ROm SM 332B
HLDS GSA-5120D External LG Super-Multi ReWriter
WDC WD400BB-75DEA0, 40 GB HD; Prolific PL3507 Combo External Hard Drive, 80 GB; Maxtor 6 L200R0 USB Hard Drive, 250GB
HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook; Intel Duo CPU 64 bit, T6400 @ 2.0Ghz; 4.0 GB RAM; Vista Home Premium 64bit
Toshiba MK3252GSX ATA 286GB hard drive; HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T50L ATA burner
Intel 4Series Express Chipset
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users






