Posted 21 July 2006 - 11:41 AM
sisterscape, on Jul 13 2006, 11:33 AM, said:
Just gave this a try and it does indeed keep the emulated drive active. I was just wondering if there was a downside to doing this. Anyone?
A little late to answer this, but the only "down" side I could think of is that it will use a little more system resources, memory, and a drive letter allocation. The latter will slightly affect how fast Windows Explorer windows open up, but since it's an emulated drive, it should be fairly fast.
Dave D-W
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick it once and you'll suck forever. - Brian Wilson
[GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H MB | Athlon II X3 440 (3.0 GHz) | 2GB DDR2 RAM | 1-500GB HD (C: XP, G: Win7, D: - Apps, E: data & apps), 1-500 GB HD Data) | 2 - LiteOn DH20A4P DVD burners | External Dell QFlix DX-20A6Q DVD +/- writer | Windows 7 | Creator 2010 | Tektronix Phaser 850 solid ink printers | Epson R220 Photo/Disc printer | Ricoh GX 5050n dye sublimation ink | Epson Workforce 1100 printer