ggrussell 8 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 I noticed this on the Windows Update this morning. Something new that was included in Vista? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
golinux 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 (edited) Erm . . . WHAT did you notice??? No link? Edited February 4, 2007 by sisterscape Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gi7omy 2 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 I got a copy back in December at the MS launch in Dublin (never installed it tho) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ggrussell 8 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 (edited) Erm . . . WHAT did you notice??? No link?LOL .NET framework 3.0 title of the thread. I figured they are trying to make WinXP backward compatible with apps written for Vista. Just like Vista comes with DirectX 10. Wonder if they will ever release that for WinXP? Edited February 4, 2007 by ggrussell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lynn98109 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 LOL .NET framework 3.0 title of the thread. I figured they are trying to make WinXP backward compatible with apps written for Vista. Just like Vista comes with DirectX 10. Wonder if they will ever release that for WinXP? Forward compatible ...? Lynn Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gi7omy 2 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 Well they did try forcing in IE7 and also pushed WMP11 - so anything is possible really Anyway - I do have some apps that need either dotNET 1 or dotNET 2 but nothing that actually needs dotNET 3 so I'll just leave that one for a while (no dotNET is backward compatible - hence my having both 1.1 and 2) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ggrussell 8 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 Forward compatible ...? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gi7omy 2 Report post Posted February 4, 2007 Now that would imply that MS is forward thinking Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
