I had high hopes for Procoder 3 - what with "grid encoding" and all and since I have a dual core, dual xeon 3.0 machine I thought it would be screaming fast - not so!! - the grid encoding is essentially the "HDV speed encoder" that they have had for years but only produces .m2t or .m2p. I have been encoding a 69 minute project - 2pass VBR [30000,24000,20000] set at "highest quality" output to elementary stream - .m2v - almost 9 hours and at "mastering quality" almost 10 hours and task manager shows performace between 25-50%. Since I have nearly 20 hours of footage (.m2t that needs to be encoded to .m2v) from last 2 1/2years this is quite disappointing.
On the other hand, I used a demo version of Sorenson Squeeze v. 4.5 set with the same parameters as above and the exact same project came through in less that fours hours and performace under task managers shows 70 to 90 % cpu usage. I also have a dual xeon 3.4 workstation and the same project was completed in about 5 hours 30 minutes.
Does anyone have an opinion about quality differences between these two programs (Sorenson Squeeze vs. Procoder 3 [or Procoder 2 for that matter since Procoder 3 has only been available for 2 days]. I am sure the quality is great from both since they are supposed to be high-end encoding solutions but "time management" certainly seems to skew things toward Sorenson.
Shuerdm - have you worked with Procoder and Sorenson - any opinions?
Question
planetweckesser
I had high hopes for Procoder 3 - what with "grid encoding" and all and since I have a dual core, dual xeon 3.0 machine I thought it would be screaming fast - not so!! - the grid encoding is essentially the "HDV speed encoder" that they have had for years but only produces .m2t or .m2p. I have been encoding a 69 minute project - 2pass VBR [30000,24000,20000] set at "highest quality" output to elementary stream - .m2v - almost 9 hours and at "mastering quality" almost 10 hours and task manager shows performace between 25-50%. Since I have nearly 20 hours of footage (.m2t that needs to be encoded to .m2v) from last 2 1/2years this is quite disappointing.
On the other hand, I used a demo version of Sorenson Squeeze v. 4.5 set with the same parameters as above and the exact same project came through in less that fours hours and performace under task managers shows 70 to 90 % cpu usage. I also have a dual xeon 3.4 workstation and the same project was completed in about 5 hours 30 minutes.
Does anyone have an opinion about quality differences between these two programs (Sorenson Squeeze vs. Procoder 3 [or Procoder 2 for that matter since Procoder 3 has only been available for 2 days]. I am sure the quality is great from both since they are supposed to be high-end encoding solutions but "time management" certainly seems to skew things toward Sorenson.
Shuerdm - have you worked with Procoder and Sorenson - any opinions?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.