There are some posts that imply the ability to simultaneously burn to 2 or more burners is a make/break consideration to the poster…
I had a small run (6) of DVD's to make so I experimented and the results were not what I expected at all…
Using 2 burners my time was 11 minutes or a throughput time of 5 1/2 min. per disc.
Burning with just one Burner my throughput time dropped to 5 min. per disc!
So for my little project I would have been better off using a single burner. – granted that 2 minute gain could be wiped out by one mistimed trip to the bathroom…
But my real question is to those with multiple burners.
Have you actually timed your throughput or are you just assuming that multiple burners must be faster???
Question
Jim_Hardin
There are some posts that imply the ability to simultaneously burn to 2 or more burners is a make/break consideration to the poster…
I had a small run (6) of DVD's to make so I experimented and the results were not what I expected at all…
Using 2 burners my time was 11 minutes or a throughput time of 5 1/2 min. per disc.
Burning with just one Burner my throughput time dropped to 5 min. per disc!
So for my little project I would have been better off using a single burner. – granted that 2 minute gain could be wiped out by one mistimed trip to the bathroom…
But my real question is to those with multiple burners.
Have you actually timed your throughput or are you just assuming that multiple burners must be faster???
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.